Pages

▼

Thursday, October 29, 2026

Building an Offensive Game Plan

 

I have been thinking about creating a post like this for a while, but it seemed a little too personal in some ways and perhaps self aggrandizing. I have never been a college coach, and I can guarantee that every single offensive coordinator in FBS football knows more than me about designing and building an offense.

But none of them work here at Touch the Banner, so what you're going to get is how I have built game plans for high school offenses. Some of it definitely translates, and some of it might not. But considering all the criticism of offensive coordinator Jason Beck recently - and he deserves it - I thought this might be an interesting task.

So here's my step-by-step look at how to plan the offense from week to week.

Step #1: What personnel is available?
In any given week, a team can be limited in what personnel is available. You start off the year - even going back to the previous winter or spring - with a grand idea of what type of athletes will be on the team in August, and you build from there. But week by week, injuries and illnesses and discipline issues change what personnel is available. I have mentioned several times before that I like to think about "getting the best 11 athletes on the field" as much as possible. Now that includes figuring out your best five linemen - and maybe they're not the best "athletes" - but football needs at least five relatively big/tough dudes who can play up front. Once you figure out those five guys, you find the other six best athletes who aren't injured/sick/suspended and try to fit them into the game plan. If you're normally in 12 personnel (1 running back, 2 tight ends) but your #2 tight end has a bad shoulder, maybe you need to focus on running plays from 11 personnel (1 running back, 1 tight end) and put another receiver on the field instead of the #2 tight end. Regardless, one of your best athletes shouldn't be standing on the sideline waiting tor a turn to play while an inferior athlete plays every down just because they fit the "body type" of the personnel grouping you want.

Hit the jump for more.


Step #2: What formations and plays have been successful against this team?
I'll admit to being a copycat. When I watch film of a prior opponent, I look for plays of 10+ yards in the run game or the pass game that have been successful against the defense I'm studying. If a team struggles to set the edge against jet sweeps, then I'm going to have jet sweeps in the game plan. If they struggle to tackle guys in space on screens, then we're going to be repping screens that week. If teams have hit verticals up the seam with slot receivers or tight ends, I'm going to look at running seam routes or four verticals. If they run man-to-man coverage but struggle to sort out coverage responsibilities out of bunch or stacked sets, I'm going to put a bunch formation or two into the game plan. Now you also have to keep in mind that when teams struggle against a concept, they often spend quite a bit of time the next week trying to fix that particular problem. So just because they struggled with bunch formations last Friday night doesn't mean they will on this upcoming Friday night.

Step #3: What's my offense's bread and butter?
This is something that fans sometimes forget, but as a high school (or college) offensive play caller, I can't start running brand new blocking schemes, formations, etc. every single week. Offenses are built on systems, and we build on things from year to year or throughout the off-season leading up into August/September. If I'm a Wing-T coach, I can't suddenly start running a spread offense out of 10 personnel just because my upcoming opponent lost 42-10 last week to a spread team. So keeping in mind step #2 above, what plays, formations, and personnel do I have in my arsenal that work well? The opponent's previous loss might have happened because they couldn't stop crossing routes or couldn't fit GT counter correctly, but if my QB stinks at throwing crossers or if I only run zone runs with no gap schemes/pullers, then I can't replicate what someone else did. So what does my team do well? Let's figure out how to make that work. And if there's something we've been doing poorly and can't get it fixed, let's scrap it.

Step #4: What formations/personnel can I use to break tendencies?
I don't want to go into this Friday's game running the same formations and plays that I ran last week, because those plays are going to be scouted. The other team is going to be practicing against them all week. I need to add new formations or motions, or maybe I just need to dig out a formation or two that we haven't run since week three. Especially in high school, players and/or coaches can't feasibly absorb every single play/formation from seven or eight different game films over the first several weeks of the season. So I want to keep them guessing from week to week. I'm also going to use at least some of these formations/motions early in the game to see how the opponent lines up to them. For example, if I only put my trips receivers to the field (the wide side) for the first three weeks of the season, then in week four, maybe I put trips into the boundary (the short side) and see what the opponent does. If they overload into the boundary because that's where I've put three receivers, then I have a lot of room to the wide side of the field to get the ball to my single receiver or a running back.

Step #5: How are we going to block their front?
A few years ago, there was an excellent defensive end playing for a rival school. He was better than either of our offensive tackles, and we didn't really have a tight end who was good enough to play much. So when we went into the game, we ran away from that defensive end. I never called a run toward the side where I knew he would align. And when he went to the sideline a couple times to catch his breath, I immediately called run plays to his replacement's side - not only because an inferior player was on the field, but to give the defense a different look. Also, do they run loops, twists, and stunts? How often do they blitz? What are their favorite blitzes? It's imperative for the offensive line, running back(s), and quarterback to have some time in pass pro to sort out the blitzes and have a plan and some muscle memory for how they're going to react when a certain blitz comes.

Step #6: What coverages do they run?
High school defenses aren't nearly as varied as college defenses. Usually a high school team will come into a game with two coverages and that's about it. Some teams might run Cover 4 and Cover 2. Some might run Cover 3 and Cover 1. Some might run Cover 4 and Cover 1. Either way, I want to come into a game knowing what their "shell" looks like so the quarterback, the receivers, and I can have a plan for how to attack their secondary. Generally, you have "man beaters" and "Cover 2 beaters" and so on down the line, but you don't really have time during practice to run every passing concept against every possible coverage out of every formation. Now in college you have to be prepared for anything and everything, but in high school, if a team always has two safeties (Cover 2 or Cover 4) and leaves the middle of the field open (MOFO), then I have a menu of plays that I think can attack their personnel and coverages. We also might have a bunch of different ways to run the Flood concept or the Shallow Cross concept, but we want to pick the right ones for that week that should work against that particular team's defense.

Step #7: What personnel advantages do I have?
Sometimes you go into a game knowing that nobody on the other team's defense can cover your slot receiver. Sometimes you know you have two guys better than anyone in the opposing secondary, so you just have to figure out which guy is going to have the biggest advantage over the guy across from him. And some years your receivers aren't great, so your best hope might be finding a week defensive tackle or linebacker to attack in the run game or with RPOs. Sometimes you don't have any personnel advantages, and then my general plan is to try to win with scheme, effort, and toughness. I may not have a receiver who can go 80 yards at any given time, so maybe I'm just better off lining up in 12 personnel, punching you in the mouth over and over, and hoping I can wear you down when it comes to the fourth quarter.

Step #8: What do they run in the red zone or on the goal line?
Most teams turn into man coverage teams as you get into the red zone or down inside the 5-yard line, and the field condenses. So the passing attack gets tricky, because all the defenders are now squeezed into a smaller area. On the one hand, this gets very predictable. On the other hand, a mistake on offense can be a huge killer of momentum/excitement. There's not much worse than getting down to your opponent's 2-yard line and then throwing an interception or fumbling a snap and losing the ball. Personally, I prefer having a goal line package once I get inside the 6-yard line and running those same plays repeatedly to perfection (or attempting perfection). My goal line package might be the same in week nine as it was in week one, because we've repped it so much that we know we're going to score inside the 6-yard line. This is something that does not work in college because defenses and defensive coaches are so good, but in high school, you can get pretty dang near automatic if you have 1st or 2nd down from the 6-yard line or closer (barring a fumble or bad snap). We reach a point in the season where we don't have to rep goal line offense much, because we've been running the same thing all year and know what to do.

64 comments:

  1. Yay! Content! :-)

    Great stuff, and I enjoyed reading this. What kept coming up in my mind was the talent gaps that must exist between high school and college. A good HS team might have one or two very good players, whereas a good college team might have a half dozen or more. If a good player on a HS team is injured (or leaves the field, as you mentioned), it's very unlikely "next man up" is anywhere near the caliber. If that's your guy, then your options drop off quite a bit; if it's their guy, then your options pick up quite a bit.

    Question (related to Michigan's offensive woes) ... what happens when you go into a game with a plan of X, and for whatever reason X simply doesn't work? Do you have a backup plan for this contingency? Or do you tweak X to see if you can finesse it into working?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I've had guys with long-term or short-term injuries just totally submarine seasons or even games because of an injury. And these weren't even quarterbacks. When you have one dynamic athlete or your starting RB gets hurt, things can go downhill in a hurry.

      I think if X doesn't work in college, you have other things you should be able to run. For example, if you think inside zone is going to work but the other team just can't be moved off the ball, you should have some outside zone or gap stuff that might work. Or maybe they load up to stop the run, so you have some play action passes planned. I've had a team stop our spread passing look (which was usually pretty successful), so we got into condensed sets (tight bunches, tight twins, etc.) and had more production.

      Delete
    2. Thanks ... always appreciate your answers, and the way you explain things.

      Delete
  2. Good stuff

    We did talk ‘best 11’ during the countdown. Most of us understood; some wanted to talk semantics

    Scenarios matter. We all knew Beck editors would come in and run SOME rhino. But getting the best guys on the field had to be a priority

    How is it that we could all see Norton was no mauler? Or that Efobi struggled with pulling?
    While I’m sure Beck watched plenty of tape, his offense didn’t account for strengths & weaknesses. It also fails to leverage the opponent Defense

    I was obviously too early to insist he be fired as soon as I put it to writing, but was I wrong? JJ Buchanan looks good. Marsh has had moments. But everyone else on offense looks much worse than hoped, and even worse than last year

    Being a high level P4 coordinator cannot be easy; but ignoring the obvious? That’s plenty of reason to cut go Beck loose. Now. And Whitt can go with him

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Rutgers game is so critical ... if Michigan trots out the same stuff, and plays poorly -- win or lose -- then the program cracks, and total implosion will follow.

      The *only* good outcome is a win where it's clear there's been a change in offensive direction, the team plays with sound execution and coherence, and there's a candid admission of prior failure and a sincere promise of change going forward.

      I fear we'll see the same stuff, but a win because Rutgers is bad. Beck and Whittingham will use this to justify the past. It will be delusional. Michigan then loses 3 of 4 remaining games.

      Delete
    2. rentfree, obsessed, etc.

      It's not semantics to say you can't easily shift to 00 personnel if your base is 23. More realistically we mean a shift between 10 and 12 but conceptually same idea.

      Just cuz you have 4 excellent WRs doesn't mean you can suddenly become run and shoot offense -- especially if your QB isn't a good passer.

      Just because one of your best 11 is a backup QB doesn't mean you can run a 2-QB offense.

      There are limits.

      Specific to Michigan:
      It's easy to sit back and say Beck should play a WR instead of the Rhino. I myself would cheer just to see it attempted. But Beck's playbook is (presumably) 50% Rhino and it's not what he wants to do or who he is. Period.

      Either he tosses out half his playbook and runs a totally different offense or he doesn't but it's not as easy as flipping a switch cuz this isn't a video game.

      This is where it's helpful to have played organized sports or coached a team in the last few decades. 1993 was a long time ago.

      Delete
    3. I don't like this idea that Jason Beck was all about the Rhino and that's all he knows. Beck has been several different places, and he hasn't always used the Rhino, at least not this much. He used it at Utah, yes, and also at New Mexico. He was also at Syracuse and Virginia where they did it much, much less.

      No offensive coordinator in FBS is so clueless that he doesn't know how to run an offense without using a converted DT/300 lb. tight end/fullback. For whatever reason, this is a personnel choice at Michigan. Now maybe it's because Hogan Hansen was hurt and they just started running lots of Rhino stuff because they didn't like their tight ends or something, but I refuse to believe that Beck CAN'T run anything else. Or that he can't drop the Rhino down to like 5-10% usage instead of 48%.

      It's a choice, and he's choosing not to change. (Maybe Saturday we'll see him turn over a new leaf.) Which is also really bad, and maybe it's even worse.

      Delete
    4. “There are limits”

      no shit. Scenarios matter. Try rereading the OP … or your own concession the last time we did this
      #exposed
      #outsmarted
      #anotherDub




      @Thunder
      Agree. And we said as much during the countdown. Sure, a 6th OL can be useful; Harbaugh was successful with one

      But as a base formation? 5o% use? Considering our options (we hoped for Babaloa/Frazier loser) of Norton (not a mauler), Efobi (lost when pulling) or one of the young, inexperienced young OL (just, God NO) … it just wasn’t realistic that our Rhino would be one of our best 11. Then we got stuck with … a converted DT

      The Western Michigan game showed how bad an idea that was (even considering Bryce). Some fans wanted to talk up WMU, but they’re not a good team or defense. Teams that have out produced/scored MICHIGAN against that Bronco D: Monmouth(!), Rice, Boise, Buffalo, KentSt (yards not points), Central Michigan, and Toledo (6ooyds & 45pts)

      Beck needs to go. My first time insisting so was probably too early, but it was correct

      Delete
    5. Beck wasn't in charge at those other places. He wasn't OC at Virginia and frankly he wasn't the real OC at Syracuse either.

      The Rhino is his identity. People asserted before the season he wouldn't play the Rhino more than half the time and then he went around and did just that -- even when he was on his 3rd option at Rhino.

      "For whatever reason, this is a personnel choice at Michigan."
      See above. I don't know why you are arguing this point. Beck feels the Rhino is essential.

      Hansen returning didn't change the reliance on Rhino. Zach Marshall being available doesn't either. There's often other TE on the field with the Rhino.

      " I refuse to believe that Beck CAN'T run anything else."
      This is a strawman. Obviously he can run non-Rhino plays because he does that pretty regularly. But it's not him. Just like Jim Harbaugh put 4 WR on the field at times doesn't mean he sees that as a viable option.

      Beck could have dropped the Rhino to 10% but it's not who he is and not what he thinks is best.

      You can't ask Dana Holgerson to run a wing T and you can't ask Sherrone Moore to run a passing spread. Jason Beck knows what he knows and it's a run-heavy package with frequent Rhino.

      Delete
    6. this is a lie. Who here “asserted he wouldn’t play the Rhino half the time?”

      There was hope he wouldn’t, and that was tied to our sixth OL not being among our best 11 … Guard was a weak spot, specifically in pulling (Efobi) and not being a mauler (Norton) … both important to the role of Rhino

      YOU hijacked the thread for sEmAnTiCs, only to concede later
      #exposed
      #lyinLank
      #banned4life

      Delete
    7. who said "here"?
      was it a fantasy or are you a...
      "liar"?

      #move the goal posts
      #take the L anyway
      #jedubclassic

      Discussion of best 11 was always around limitations. Initial semantics was around "athlete" and we got through it pretty quick. LOL but the rent in your head remains free. You admit now to limitations (e.g., 5 at least gotta be OL), but had to argue anyway. Couldn't handle the theoretical (11 QBs don't work). Couldn't handle the specifics either (Beck likes to have blockers). Either way you can't handle the debate.
      #notbuilt4this

      Delete
    8. The conversation happened HERE, on touch the banner, lank. You know this, but feign ignorance. You lie


      Here’s another lie exposed: the five OL were included from the start of the best five discussion:
      Thunder on August 11, 2026 at 5:48 PM
      “I have my doubts about whether the Rhino will be used quite so often at Michigan in 2025. I think you can put a Rhino out there if he's one of your best ~11 athletes, but I'm not sure I would call the sixth lineman that. Here's one way to think about it, WITH 5 LINEMAN BECAUSE DUH”
      (proceeded with a list)


      Football guys know this is obvious. Non football guys like you simply don’t get it. Or you were trolling. Again. Either way, you hijacked the conversation for semantics.
      receipts:
      http://touchthebanner.blogspot.com/2026/08/2026-season-countdown-46-50.html



      You weren’t banned for replying. You were banned for toxic trolling. You’re a lying liar who lies, and I am here to expose you

      Delete
    9. Classic JE. Can't argue the point so has to make up a fake one to argue against. And then....he posts his own L.

      Thanks for the link remember this:

      je93November 9, 2026 at 10:21 PM
      this is a lie. Who here “asserted he wouldn’t play the Rhino half the time?

      Your answer via your link:

      "ThunderAugust 11, 2026 at 5:48 PM
      I have my doubts about whether the Rhino will be used quite so often at Michigan in 2025."

      #HIU

      now let's rehash the debate for the thirst-havers

      Layer 0 (semantics): Best 11 athletes doesn't refer to objective athleticism.
      Response: It refers to best 11 players relative to their abilities at their position.
      Note: We all agreed and moved on quickly.


      Layer 1: You can't play your best 11 -- we have these things called positions. (e.g., you can't play 11 WRs or 11 QBs or 11 whatevers)
      Response: Duh you need 5 OL.

      Layer2: OK great now also recognize you also need 1 QB not 2, 1 RB not 2 (unless you want them to play WR or FB) and probably need at least 1 WR. So you've filled up 8 of your "best 11" with guys who have to fill specific roles but aren't necessarily in your "best 11 players" [see 2024 QBs]. What we're really talking about is can you switch from 22 to 10 (or whatever) personnel package as needed to suit your player abilities -- which is a different issue, but we're getting somewhere.
      Response: We're talking about playing a 6th OL at Michigan.

      Layer 3: The system is the system and some systems want extra blockers not extra receivers. You can't just flip personnel between wing T and 5 wide if your coach doesn't play that system. Moreover you are trying to complement your best players and the ones with the ball, not just get the most talent/athleticism on the field.
      Response:

      Layer 4: Are you SURE the best 11 doesn't include 6 OL?
      This is the new part of the discussion I'll throw in. See below.

      Delete
    10. Given the coaching incompetence you and Thunder (and me) don't know who the best 11 are still but OG appears to be the least of our worries. You were wrong about your lists that put Efobi and Norton down at the bottom because there are way bigger problems.

      Ffrench isn't anywhere near the best 11. He plays lesson than Goodwin.
      Babalola looks like a high school player and isn't either.
      Neither Marshall looks like they are part of the best 11 right now either.

      Go back to the linked post and review the lists you made. Now compare it to something more objective like the PFF ranks of the offensive personnel. I'll ask again - are you SURE the best 11 doesn't include 6 OL?

      Who is on the bench who absolutely positively should be out there because they are such an exceptional talent that we are failing on the "best 11" concept?

      If I'm looking at the best 11 I'd probably rank it like this:
      1. Buchanan
      2. Guarnera
      3. Sprague (out)
      4. Marsh
      5. Link
      6. Hiter (or Marshall if healthy)
      7. Frazier
      8. Efobi
      9. Norton
      10. Carr (or Underwood) but only because you need a QB

      I don't even know who we are putting in after this. Johnson? Hansen? Gach? Biegel? Owens? Kuzdal? Moa? Walbridge? Hoffman? Goodwin? None of these guys are stand out players.

      You have to run the system your coaches know how to run. If healthy, 6 of your 10 best players are probably OL and there's no obvious TE who is better than the worst of them.

      Based on personnel, it's completely reasonable to think a heavy package was the way to go. What isn't reasonable is how Beck chose to deploy it.

      Bottomline -- the best 11 analysis was way off, both in assessment of players and realities coaches face.

      Delete
    11. Efobi is bad. I would definitely put Hansen above Efobi. Also Zach Marshall.

      Also...this goes around in coaching circles all the time...

      ...if you have a system that can't be adjusted to fit your personnel, then you have a flawed system. If Jason Beck's "system" is such that he doesn't know what to do with a tight end that isn't a 290 lb. offensive lineman, then he has a flawed system. And if that's the case, then he's got a giant glaring weak spot as an offensive coordinator.

      Personally, I don't think Beck is limited to the Rhino as a base package, because he didn't use that system at Syracuse and Virginia. It's something he instituted in the past couple years and can't/didn't want to move away from it for whatever reason. It's like a contact hitter who starts swinging for the fences because he hit a few homers...and now his swing is f***ed up, even if he just wants to go back to hitting singles and doubles.

      Delete
    12. RE: Beck's system

      Beck knows how to use a TE -- see Utah last year. He just doesn't think Michigan has any good ones -- to the point that Hoffman (who Moore thought was more of a FB) is the top option.

      Beck does not want 3 or 4 WRs -- he wants blockers - that's his system. Moore and Harbaugh had the same thinking, while another run heavy Michigan coach (Rich Rod) loved playing 4 WRs.

      Beck has 3 years of OC experience in the NCAA. So the last 2 years are 67% of his track record, not some kind of weird recent trend. Beck was never an OC at Virginia - he was the QB coach under Robert Anae (whose 'star' has fallen as well BTW) under Mendenhall. Beck/Anae were a pair before that BYU. Then Beck was again the QB coach under Anae at Syracuse under Dino Babers. Babers as you know is an offensive coach (big on spread passing) so he had some influence (much moreso than Whitt). Once Anae left Syracuse abruptly and Beck was promoted to OC (for the first time in NCAA) in 2023.

      I dunno if you want to deep dive into Syracuse in 2023 cuz it's pretty weird and complex but bottom line was that Beck ended up extremely run heavy once former Michigan QB-turned TE Dan Villari got moved back to QB due to injury.

      Beck showed flexibility in 2023 but ultimately embraced a QB run heavy offense that he then carried into his 1 year at New Mexico and 1 year at Utah. 3 years total -- most of which have had multiple TEs, 6OL and NOT 3 or 4 WRs.

      RE: Personnel

      I think what this debate is really about is playing a 3rd WR instead of a blocker (be it a Rhino like Biegel/Gach/Babalola or an H-back like Hoffman/Owens).

      FWIW Efobi's PFF score is better than Guarnera's on the year. All of our OL is mediocre according to PFF (in the 60s). Mgoblog UFR scores don't support Efobi being a weak link either -- he's been playing at the same level as the other guys. Moreover, he's the one guy who has stayed healthy all year.

      Hansen is a functional receiver but still stinks at blocking.

      REGARDLESS -- This line of argument is kinda beside the point though -- both can still fit in the top 11. You've got (let's agree) one of the best 5OL with Sprague out and your favorite TE Hansen as TE1. Great. I'll reorder the bottom of my list to align better with your opinion of Hansen > Efobi.

      7. QB
      8. Hansen
      9. Norton
      10. Efobi

      You're still not identifying the BEST 11. So now who else are you putting into the lineup to get to the best 11?

      Goodwin? Biegel? a freshman WR? Hoffman? Owens?

      ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Delete
    13. I don't think Guarnera has been good, either. But you need a center who can snap the ball consistently, and Guarnera has been good with his snaps.

      I've identified the best 11 before. I don't need to do it repeatedly.

      Delete
    14. That's true you don't. Below is what you wrote before. I'll respond to that.

      1. Underwood - benched / not the best QB
      2. Marsh - yes
      3. Buchanan - yes
      4. Frazier* - yes when healthy
      5. Babalola* - not in the top 20 let alone the 11
      6. Guarnera* - yes
      7. Link* - yes
      8. Sprague* - unavailable
      9. Jordan Marshall - maybe before he was hurt now Kuzdal plays more
      10. Ffrench - not even one of the top 5 WRs
      11. Hiter - Marshall and Hiter on the field at the same time doesn't work


      Bottom line -- you need people to block. There are no TEs listed and one of the OL is hurt. There are 2 RBs which nobody does. The above implies using 10 personnel with Hiter as a receiver -- but this isn't a Rich Rod offense and isn't playing to Hiter's strength.

      You can't just put out a bunch of skill position guys when your OC has built his offense around using heavy personnel. It doesn't work.

      So even if we make some logical updates to the list (Carr in for Underwood, Norton in for Sprague, Efobi in for Babalola, Hansen in for Hiter) you still have a 3rd WR (Ffrench or whoever) that isn't very good and is a liability as a blocker, with a QB who can't pay off the threat of said player in the passing game.

      Bottomline - it still doesn't make sense, on multiple fronts -- scheme or personnel.

      Delete
    15. I'll try to put in more succinct terms. You've suggested something like 10 personnel. That can't work for this team because:

      1) Our OC does not know how to run an offense based on 10. He never has and likely never will. Like Harbaugh, he bases out of 12 or 22 (usually with an OL as a TE).*

      2) Our 19 year old QB does not having the passing ability to execute out of 10 and is not prepared for it.

      3) It is my opinion that you've misidentified the best players on offense including Babalola and Ffrench who are clearly not in the best 11.

      4) It is my opinion you've undervalued the importance of blocking in executing the offense. There's only one ball and the best threats on offense with the ball are the QB, the RB, and the top 2 WR. Giving the ball to anyone else is fine of course as a change up but the top 4 need to get the ball the most and they usually need blockers who can execute blocks ahead of them, not freshman who are gonna struggle to execute consistently. This is why Goodwin plays more than Moa for example despite being vastly inferior as a pass-catching threat and with the ball in his hands.

      *Harbaugh wouldn't have gone with 10 either. Rodriguez would have -- but that was what he built his offense around -- he couldn't flip his base (to 12 or 22) either.

      I say this because even when he had Gattis as his OC and a WR group of Collins/DPJ/Bell/Black/Sainristil. Even then -- he regularly used 2 TE sets including occasional extra OL.

      Delete
    16. I don't really understand what's being argued anymore.

      The current system isn't/wasn't working. This is why Beck was fired, and everyone knows it.

      Continuing with that system is stupid. Insisting that "the coaches only know how to run this system" when that's clearly not the case because they have run other systems is hogwash.

      These guys are paid millions of dollars or hundreds of thousands of dollars to figure it out.

      The ceiling for this team isn't being like #130 in offense. It's not. It wasn't last year, and it's not this year. The coaches f***ed it up. There's no way around it. I don't really care if it's 11 or 12 or 10 or 20 or 21 or 13 personnel, running Rhino 37% or 48% of the time isn't working and it's dumb.

      Next.

      Delete
    17. Lmao, more trolling … classic lank

      Delete
  3. Program is cracked. Not only do we suck on Offense, our SpTms isn’t very good either. We have one Captain on the bench, and another who can’t keep a TrFr and walkon on the sidelines

    Our Bowl outlook is bleak, with a high likelihood of mass exodus as soon as the portal opens

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great post. Bravo. I know I'm banned but I thought I'd "log on" to say that.

    Also -- consider yourself hired as Jason Beck's replacement.

    Follow up questions:

    Q1

    "If I'm a Wing-T coach, I can't suddenly start running a spread offense out of 10 personnel"

    I've seen some coaches try to make this massive kind of change in the offseason due to losing a key player to graduation...but I've never seen it work. Specifically teams losing a dual threat RPO QB who made the whole thing work and then he graduates and there's no viable replacement. Public schools can't necessarily "recruit" a replacement the same way some higher end private schools do. So if you don't have the QB or RB who is the same level of skill/athlete, you can end up changing your whole offense/identity that was built around that guy. In season you don't really have the option but in an offseason you can install a new scheme (to fit with personnel). I'm just not sure you can do it well...anyway -- question is this:

    Does your scheme/identity sometimes dictate that you can't play your best 11 in the moment in time?

    [it seems like Jason Beck thinks the answer is yes]

    Q2.
    "lining up in 12 personnel, punching you in the mouth over and over, and hoping I can wear you down when it comes to the fourth quarter."

    I've seen this work obviously as a Michigan fan. How often has this worked for you personally?

    -Lank

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “I know I'm banned but I thought I'd "log on" to say that”


      Oh look, it’s Lank. We haven’t heard from him since … about 15 minutes ago. Lmao, trolling or not, absolutely no integrity
      #lyinLank

      Delete
    2. lol look at who is posting about post frequency. bow down to the king everyone. #jedub

      Delete
    3. new hashtag alert! tell the rec center

      Delete
  5. je93 and Lank turning every comment thread into a sh*tshow. :-(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lank, if you don’t want that smoke, don’t come at me

      Delete
    2. Not Lank ... seriously, not Lank. Someone else. Sick and tired of the bickering.

      Delete
    3. lolololol JE chasing ghosts. Anon -- I don't disagree but JE has to make every thread about him. #JEDUB

      Delete
    4. Tell us again why you’re banned Lank
      #banned4life

      Delete
    5. Responding to your 50 billion posts mostly but without being a boot-licker while I did it.

      Delete
    6. 5o billion?

      You can’t keep up, so you must lie
      #exposed

      Delete
    7. lol. great #jedub
      you got me

      Delete
  6. What I think happened is the offense spent the whole offseason practicing certain concepts. Those concepts have been studied and game planned (I read it at mgoblog and it makes sense). Our offense become very predictable. My question is if indeed this is the case, how much can Beck do to change the offense midway through the season? Afterall you spent majority of the offseason in rhino. Do you tweak it or is it possible to make wholesale changes midseason?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The OP hits on this: anticipating opponent response and having counters ready to go

      But that’s another way “best 11” is being misunderstood: a coaching staff must leverage their best players and assert their will on the opponent

      Can’t do that if you’re stubbornly forcing DTs into the OL, and then backing him up with a brand new Guard

      Beck has got to go

      Delete
    2. Cant run the ball on rutgers

      Fire Beck in the lockeroom

      Delete
    3. Fire Harding and Alford as well. Might as well keep going: Coombs, Detmer...

      In all seriousness, Michigan should just forfeit the rest of their games and shut down all football operations. Fire *everybody* on the coaching staff. Appoint an acting AD and get a new HC lined up.

      Delete
    4. Tied up 21-21 in the 4th quarter ... to *Rutgers*. Whatever the final scoreboard reads, Michigan has lost this game. There's nothing salvageable here. Nothing at all.

      Delete
    5. It should never have been that close.

      Carr is obviously a more capable QB than Underwood.

      Jay Hill had Martindale moments today.

      Delete
  7. Take the Dub. Always

    Tommy is just a better QB than Bryce. Poise leads to patience, improved vision, and the ability to get the ball to more targets
    Still, that noodle arm. He probably needs another two years just to get his arm strength to CJ’s, but even that leaves a lot to be desired
    We need a portal QB

    Fire Beck. Rutgers O sucks. Still, with their backup QB and without their best player, the rutger OC was able to create and exploit a few matchups … ugly, but almost enough success. Meanwhile, our “talent advantage” looked stuck & lost. That’s all coaching

    GO BLUE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Take the W, but take no comfort in it. This was like beating Akron in 2014: it's a barometer for how bad a football team Michigan is. Also, very disappointed in the defense today. It seemed like Jay Hill was trying to do clever things when just a base defense would have done the job.

      Delete
    2. Tommy is a better QB right now because he is a better runner. I don't know if he can win a track race but he plays faster. He's more decisive and he has better vision as a runner. That matters. But as a passer...well, he is better at checking down to easy stuff, but can't make the plays Bryce can. He's making mistakes all the time just like Bryce. As expected for two guys who are barely 19.

      It doesn't really matter right now but if I was the OC I would rotate them both and hope one of them is giving you some juice on a given day. Ride the hot hand and keep the D off balance with two different skillsets.

      Delete
  8. I said last week it was ridiculous to rely on your noodle arm TrFR … Sparty did nothing special. They just dared young Tommy to beat them w/his arm. Disaster

    Defense still can’t tackle, not even Sparty’s 4th & 5th RB

    I may have been to quick to want Beck fired, but he doesn’t belong here. Fire him ASAP



    *Utes lose half their staff and three of their best players. They improve
    We import that staff & players, plus the best of our own … we got worse

    I want sleepy Kyle gone!

    ReplyDelete
  9. ZMarshall, benched (fired)
    CAPTAIN Bryce, benched (fired)
    Butkowski, benched (fired)
    (CAPTAIN) Marshall, benched (fired)
    Five star Hiter, benched (fired)
    Kuzdal, benched (fired)

    In this new era of big money CFB, it’s time to break norms: fire everybody. Get a head start on coaching search and the Portal. We’ll need it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Efobi got benched too, but I’ll allow removing the turnstile … Babaloa didn’t look great in limited snaps

      Delete
    2. Michigan ought to seriously consider forfeiting the remaining games, and shut down football operations right now. Plan on every single coach to be gone. Plan on the entire team to portal away. Plan on a complete rebuild, from the ground up.

      Delete
    3. Lol, no. Just no

      Oregon dumped their OC and turned around immediately

      Not saying their is a coach on this staff who can beat UCLA, Oregon or ohio, but the bleeding can be stopped

      Then get a new coach, and start the rebuild. There’s talent on this roster. Many will bolt, but we can retain enough, bring in enough, and turn this mess around with the right hire


      but without an AD or President, that’s not likely to happen, even for next season

      Delete
    4. The obvious difference in Oregon is their HC is an offense guy. If our D was atrocious Whitt could step in but he's a defense guy relying on his OC to be "Head coach of the offense".

      Delete
    5. Wrong again Lank. Lanning is a defensive guy

      Delete
    6. My mistake. I stand corrected.

      Delete
  10. My guess is that Utah had success in spite of KW. The current Utah coach (who had been coach in waiting for years) was the more important ingredient to the success than KW.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Harbaugh’s Chargers is 0-7. Michigan is not going to have a winning season. The divorce was a bad outcome for both party.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Harbaugh did Michigan no favors by stringing things out until *he* accomplished his plans, then leaving Michigan to scramble to backfill. Given the timing (late winter/early spring), doing a coaching search was not likely to yield a good result, so elevating Sherrone Moore made some sense. Moore was not a long-term solution: he does not have what it takes to be a head coach at a program like Michigan. Moore then compounded the issue with his off-field behavior, which seemed to bleed back into his coaching job because there was enormous dissension within the coaching staff (reportedly Moore and Martindale weren't talking), which then bled down to the players. His firing was necessary, given the clear violation of university policy. But the hiring of Whittingham is, seen in retrospect, a huge mistake.

    I am increasingly coming to the conclusion that the Michigan head coaching position is no longer seen as a destination, or dream job. I am increasingly convinced that young up-and-coming coaches see the problems at this program and say, "I want nothing to do with that." The program has status (but that's fading away rapidly), and money, but it's also a place where a coach can reasonably think that other programs would be better for their long-term careers.

    Further, I think we're on the leading edge of the whole college game fracturing and falling apart. The structural problems with NIL and the transfer portal, along with the 24-team playoff proposal, along with TV money dictating too much, is ripping the whole thing apart. The sooner the game splits into NFL farm teams for the bigger programs, and a return to something approximating the amateur game to the lesser programs, the better.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Matt Campbell on PennSt back to back wins:
    “First of all, as a head football coach, lead. Don’t sit back. Right. And just assume it’s going to happen,” Campbell said definitively. “I think the biggest thing for me was trying to help our guys regain their poise. Don’t just want them to have poise, go lead them to have some poise, and help them get through it.”


    the next time we see sleepy Kyle interacting with his players will be the first
    Dude needs to go

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL. Yes -- the model here is totally the guy who 5-4 (2-4 in conference play). I wish we could have the same record at Michigan!

      I mean sure they've had an easier schedule and Campbell lost to Whitt head to head but what would you expect with a guy playing with inferior resources at...(checks notes)....wait this says Penn State. Aren't they also a blue blood traditional power? I thought he was still a MAC coach.;;;

      LOL.

      At least Whitt has had some P5 success. Campbell is a poor man's Hoke.

      Campbell completely pooping the bed at PSU is a perfect example of why fans don't know what the hell they are talking about when they suggest coaching changes. Remember this is the guy people wanted to fire Harbaugh to go out and hire?

      He's been coaching 500 ball ever since. PSU is effed worse than us! James Franklin is a far better coach and is sitting at 6-3 with Va Tech.

      At least we can hang our hat on a top 5 defense and isolate the problems to the O. PSU stinks on both fronts and lost to Northwestern by 3 scores. Oof

      Delete
    2. Who called Campbell a model? No one here is even saying he is any good. Arguing against something nobody said. Classic lyinLank

      That one statement is about direction; the direction needed for our program. Whit has no direction

      Delete
    3. Who said anyone called anyone anything?
      #outsmarted

      Campbell's direction is dragging PSU down

      Delete
    4. Lank today:
      “Who said anyone called anyone anything?”

      Lank yesterday:
      “LOL. Yes -- the model here is … “


      It’s easy to expose you because your lies are so inconsistent. Not even lank believes lank. No principle. Just trolling. Definitely not smart enough

      Delete
    5. Exposed. No denying it, so you DODGE
      #notsmartenough
      #lyinLank
      #jeDub

      Delete
  14. Honestly, I have seldom seen this level of childishness from what I presume to be grown men. Both sides are guilty: one is needlessly contrarian, the other needlessly reactive. The two of you should be ashamed. Both of you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL reactive is one way to put it. JE been slinging mud for over a decade on this blog (and surely his whole life elsewhere). He can't help but resort to insults and personal attacks -- it's all he knows. I stopped trying to restrain myself from stooping to his level years ago. To me it's funny.

      My takes may often be contrarian but they are legitimate. You can disagree with them -- but they are always on topic (Michigan football) and backed by reason, logic or evidence. You don't have to agree with the rationale or think the evidence is convincing -- but I make my case with all due respect. The only person I've ever been disrespectful to here is JE, who has demonstrated he doesn't deserve any.

      Delete
    2. I think some introspection is called for on your part. You are contrarian beyond the point of reasonable debate. There comes a point in a discussion where pursuing a point is no longer of value, and doubling-down is ungracious. I've seen it time and again with exchanges between you and Thunder, and Thunder's exasperation is clearly evident. There is deep wisdom in the idea of being "slow to speak and quick to listen."

      I am disheartened because there are so few places on the internet where sensible inquiry and discussion takes place. It's a sign that "social fabric" -- that which holds a civil society together -- is ripping, and in fact is torn past the point of repair. Still, one seeks a quiet corner where civility and graciousness might still prevail.

      Delete
    3. Creating another aNoN to set up another lied-packed excuse is classic Lank

      You’ve litrally created usernames with mocking & insults. You’re just not good at it, and got banned

      Rightfully so
      #jeDub

      Delete