 |
| Detroit (MI) King running back/returner committed to Michigan on Tuesday evening |
Ratings:
ESPN: 3-star, #81 RB
Rivals: 4-star, #5 all-purpose back, #206 overall
Scout: 4-star, #19 RB
247 Sports: 4-star, #7 all-purpose back, #169 overall, 95 grade
Norfleet is 5'8", 175 lbs. and lists a 4.34 time in the forty. As a junior he had 1,880 yards and 31 touchdowns. He followed that up with 2,033 yards and 27 touchdowns as a senior.
Norfleet is solidly built despite being quite short. He stated on Tuesday night that Michigan offered him a chance to play running back, slot receiver, kick returner, and punt returner. Michigan hasn't had a consistent punt returner since Steve Breaston, and there hasn't been a solid kickoff return guy since Darryl Stonum in 2009. Norfleet has the short-area quickness and the breakaway speed to be effective at both of those positions. He also could be used as a zone read option guy in the backfield with Denard Robinson or Devin Gardner, or as a pass receiver in the mold of Vincent Smith.
Aside from the obvious concern about his size - his chances of being the full-time back are very slim - I'm not a big fan of the way Norfleet finishes plays. He jogs into the endzone too often, which rubs me the wrong way and makes me question how disciplined he is. Still, it's better to take an athletic guy whom you might have to instill with some discipline than to bank the scholarship for next year.
Norfleet is Michigan's 25th commitment in the class of 2012. He's also the first guy from Martin Luther King High School since defensive tackle Larry Harrison and safety Ernest Shazor left after the 2004 season.
TTB Rating: 76
I believe we now have our answer concerning DeAnthony Arnett.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure what you mean by that...?
DeleteI could have been more clear, I was hurrying.
DeleteThe question being how can there be no room for Arnett.
I'm speculating they thought they could get Norfleet if they ended up having room and they preferred him to Arnett.
Two similar types, Norfleet a bit more explosive maybe.
Two similar types? Except for that Arnett is about 7 inches taller... Am I missing something?
DeleteThere was no room for Arnett now (January, winter semester). Next year wasn't the issue. Arnett wanted to start going to classes right away.
DeleteI was battling Rhian mesmerization.
DeleteI had Arnett for 5'9" ish, my bad, but he was/is light, quick, elusive, an underneath type with return guy potential.
The only difference beyond height is that they'll hand the ball to Norfleet some maybe, but it won't be often. He'll be running the wheel and sneaking out underneath.
I'll stick with my characterization.
Looks like V. Smith 2.0 to me. Hopefully he develops into a great blocker like Vincent has; if so, I think he'll be able to help the team in a few years.
ReplyDeleteTTB rating?
ReplyDelete65-75. I don't know if he's ever going to be a starter in the big ten. 3rd down specialist slot receiver.
DeleteFinishing plays is something the coaches can take care of. I'm not concerned about that. His speed, however, is something you can't coach. You either have that, or you don't.
ReplyDeleteDo you think that his commitment changes how we view Justice Hayes? A lot of people thought Hayes would be a slot receiver/running back. Does Norfleet's commitment make Hayes more of a slot receiver now?
Finishing plays is something the coaches can take care of. I'm not concerned about that too much. His speed is something you can't pass up; you either have elite speed, or you don't. He does.
ReplyDeleteI'm curious to know what you think about how this affects Justice Hayes. I know a lot of us thought Hayes would be a slot receiver/running back. Does Norfleet's commitment make Hayes more of a slot guy now?
Have you seen him play in person?
ReplyDeleteFYI, I've spoken with an opposing high school coach who thought Norfleet compared very favorably with Drake Johnson.
Ugh, sorry for the double post. I submitted once but it didn't say whether it submitted or not.
ReplyDeleteOn paper (and, actually, on film), Norfleet reminds me a bit of Teric Jones from the '09 class. Pocket-sized jets ...
ReplyDeleteNorfleet seems to have more lateral shiftiness. Any comments on that from the TTB crowd?
I can see the comparison between Teric Jones and Norfleet, but Norfleet is a tougher runner and, like you said, he has more lateral quickness. I always thought Jones would be okay as a slot receiver because he didn't have the build to shake off linebackers and defensive linemen, but he had the quickness to make some things happen in open space. Jones was never going to be a special player, though.
DeleteNorfleet's just as fast as Jones or a bit faster, but he'll also be able to run the ball and should be a good punt returner, too.
How tall really is Norefleet? 24/7 and our commitment post list him at 5'8'', Scout and Rivals say 5'7'' while MGoBlog says 5'6'' "on a good day." Someone grab their tape measure and head to Detroit!
ReplyDeleteI think ESPN has him listed at 5'9", so who really knows? I decided to take the middle/slightly optimistic road and list him at 5'8".
Deletehe will be the greatest returner michigan ever had. don't know about his potential at other positions though. i guess they can put him in plays where he will get the ball in space and allow him to dazzle.
DeleteBut really, if you had to play offense, defense, returner, punter, kicker, and sometimes quarterback; you would jog into the endzone after a 60 yard run too. You are so full of crap sometimes Thunder. The kid is superbly tough and started 4years of hard hitting football while being the smallest guy on the field every day.
You cant show me more than one guy in the 2012 class with a better highlight tape than his. He will be special, and might just average 10 carries a game in his junior year & after
Am I right in thinking his floor is Teric Jones, his ceiling is Darren Sproles, and his expectation should be Vincent Smith?
ReplyDeleteI think his floor is higher than Teric Jones...but otherwise, yeah, that's probably pretty accurate.
Delete