|Denard Robinson - Image via MGoBlog.com|
I have been toying with creating my own ratings system for a while, and the increased readership here at Touch the Banner - although far short of being a college football blogging juggernaut - has made it a more realistic option. I'm somewhat flattered that people trust my analysis and observations to the point that some are requesting even more information, but this is just as much an entertaining endeavor for me so I can look back at my ratings in a few years and see whether I was in the ballpark.
Moving beyond all that, I'm requesting any feedback you might have on the rating system I'm proposing below. The 5-star systems used by Rivals and Scout make very little sense to me (sometimes the 30th-best player and the 300th-best player both have a 4-star ranking), and ESPN's 100-point scale is somewhat ridiculous, too (even though ESPN has 100 points to play with, virtually all recruits seem to fall within the 77-81 range on the scale).
Therefore, I'm proposing using a rating system loosely based on . . . EA Sports' NCAA Football series, because everyone understands it and there's more opportunity for differentiating between prospects. Here are my thoughts for rankings:
100 = Prospect could immediately be star in the NFL
90-99 = Prospect has high likelihood of developing into All-America or first round NFL draft pick
80-89 = Prospect has high likelihood of being an all-conference player or mid-round NFL draft pick
70-79 = Prospect has high likelihood of being solid starter in college or fringe NFL draft pick
60-69 = Prospect has high likelihood of being a career college backup or occasional starter
50-59 = Prospect has little chance to make an impact at FBS college level
0-49 = Prospect has little chance of tying shoes without falling down
Please leave comments or e-mail me if you have any suggestions for tweaking the rating system, or if you just want to say, "Looks good, so get on with the ratings!!!!"
You can now follow Touch the Banner on Twitter.