Sunday, December 28, 2014

What I've Been Reading


Sharp Objects  by Gillian Flynn. I swear I didn't jump on the Gone Girl  bandwagon once it was optioned as a Ben Affleck movie, but it did get me hooked on Gillian Flynn . . . sort of. Sharp Objects  was the author's first book, and it seems like a little bit of an amateur effort. I appreciate Flynn's wit, but I thought this was a little Chuck Palahniuk Lite. The protagonist, Camille Preaker, is a newspaper writer outside of Chicago when she hears of a serial killer in her Missouri hometown. She's dispatched to Wind Gap, MO (which is not a real place) to follow the story. While there she deals with her hateful, cruel, rich mother (a woman of the type that probably does not exist), her promiscuous 13-year-old half-sister, and the gossip-fueled women of Wind Gap. In what's seemingly supposed to be a believable murder mystery, the story is thrown off by the ridiculous mother, the ridiculous sister, and the ridiculous protagonist herself. I had a hard time getting entranced by the story involving self-mutilators, 13-year-olds getting gangbanged, and a 30-year-old professional reporter dropping acid with her 13-year-old sister.

Blink  by Malcolm Gladwell. I've been on a Malcom Gladwell kick for the last several months, and the only book of his I have yet to read is David and Goliath. Blink  talks about humans' abilities to "thin slice," which is taking small amounts of information and making quick decisions. Some of the chapters talk about Pepsi vs. Coke taste tests, police interactions with suspects (which I find relevant to the Michael Brown/Darren Wilson situation in Ferguson, MO), judging the authenticity of works of art, etc. One portion I found relevant was where Gladwell talks to a tennis coach who has an uncanny ability to judge whether a tennis player is about to double-fault. Even the coach himself couldn't explain what body movements during a serve would help him judge the player's serve accuracy, but he's almost always correct. I found that somewhat applicable to my job as a coach and, to a lesser extent, my "job" here as a fan, blogger, and recruiting fanatic. Of course, I wouldn't claim to be right the vast majority of the time, but sometimes there just appear to be body movements that are or are not conducive to being successful in sports.

The Magician's Land  by Lev Grossman. I have previously touted the books The Magicians  and The Magician King  by Grossman on this here blog, and The Magician's Land  is the third installment, which was released late this summer. I am such a fan that I pre-ordered the book. I have never done that for a book before. The trilogy started off with a kid named Quentin Coldwater, who was recruited to a Hogwart's-like school. Quentin isn't The Chosen One like Harry Potter, but he's a pretty good magician who finds himself in some hairy situations, including traveling to a Narnia-like universe. I can't really put my finger on what I like about this series so much, but each of the books has been a page-turner to me. This third part of the trilogy concentrates on Quentin trying to bring the love his life back from the dead, as well as the possible extinction of Fillory (a.k.a. Narnia). If you like fantasy stuff at all, I highly recommend this series.

Guardians of the Galaxy: The Complete Collection Volume 1  by Dan Abnett and Andy Lanning. Unlike with Gillian Flynn and Gone Girl, I totally was not interested in these comics until I saw the movie this summer. The movie was so fun and interesting to me that I wanted to get some of the background. While the comics aren't quite as interesting to me - let's just say Chris Pratt is more entertaining on screen than Star-Lord is on the page - I still found them enjoyable. Also, I can deal with Rocket Raccoon as a main character, but Cosmo the telepathic Russian space dog is too over the top for me. Maybe that's why they didn't include him in the movie. It's just too much to handle at once. You mean there's a dog that talks? And not only does it talk, but it has supernatural powers? And not only does it talk and have supernatural powers, but it inserts a "k" sound whenever there should be a "g" sound? Okay, that's too much. I'm going to need some time to process this. Let's just start off with the raccoon who seems to be a candidate for NRA president.

You can check out my past "What I've Been Reading" posts here (LINK).

15 comments:

  1. I enjoyed Pratt in GoG as well. Can we talk about this "mix tape" though? Runaways, 10cc and Marvin Gaye? I know, it's a mix, but that is just not a tape a 1988 kid would make. No hair metal, no rap, not even synth pop or dance junk.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree it was a funky mix tape. I have to say that I hate '80's music (for the most part), so I'm kind of glad some of the fat got trimmed. A playlist including Def Leppard, Whitesnake, Judas Priest, and Night Ranger would have made me retch.

      Delete
    2. This is the second time this week that i've encountered the I hate 80's music thing. I don't know how that's possible. Having asked pointed questions in the first instance it seems that hater #1 was experiencing difficulties getting laid and blamed it on the music.

      A great decade for Pop singles. Rock the Casbah, Come on Eileen, Mexican Radio, Down Under, I Feel for You, Whip It and those were just a list of the played to death, in rotation until you wanted to puke hits that I could come up with without even trying. The under the radar stuff was wonderful as well.

      Antmusic.

      I still hate the Hair Bands with a bile that I believe to be unmatchable, especially the dreadful "metal ballad". But I'm blaming that abomination on L.A., not the 80's.

      Delete
    3. The Message, for god sakes. That tune alone would redeem any period it came out of.

      You can see that you got to me on this one.

      Delete
    4. He states that his Mom made him the mixtape. So, that explains a fair bit.

      Delete
    5. There are definitely some individual songs from the '80's that are acceptable or even fun. But the popular genres, the bands as a whole, etc. were just bad. There aren't many bands from that time that I can look at and say, "They had a quality career" or "They put out a lot of good albums."

      It's like if you look at the 1990's and say "That was a good decade of music because All 4 One put out 'I Swear.'"

      Oh...and I've never liked "Rock the Casbah." That one doesn't count for you.

      Delete
  2. Sharp Objects was twisted. I was also somewhat put off by some of the content, but man Flynn is fearless. It was incredibly bold as a debut novel. I am reading Dark Places right now and I am intrigued but have some trepidation as to how just how "dark" she is going to get. I like these posts, and based on a lot of the earlier books you have posted, have you read "The Given Day" and "Live by Night" by Lehane? I remember you got into somewhat of a Lehane binge a while back but can't remember if these were included. They are "committment "reading" for sure as they two of them together are over 1000 pages but they are damn good. Somewhat Godfather-esque in the story telling.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was on a Dennis Lehane binge. I still want to read more of him, just got sidetracked. Thanks for the suggestions! I haven't read those two.

      I agree that it was a pretty fearless debut by Gillian Flynn. She definitely didn't ease into her literary career with soft content. And yeah, I didn't think it was *bad* but I just like my dark books to either be believably twisted (like Lehane or even "Gone Girl") or obvious mind benders (Palahniuk). I just felt like she tried to sell write it as a crime novel when it seemed to be some sort of takedown of midwestern female culture.

      Delete
  3. Based on this post I purchased "The Magicans" for my wife for Christmas. Thanks for the help!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, man...that's a lot of pressure. I hope she likes it!

      Delete
  4. Have you read any of the "Killing" books by O'Reilly? I read Killing Patton and found it entertaining and a pretty interesting perspective. Then I followed that up by reading Killing Kennedy. He has 2 other books out in that series, Killing Lincoln and Killing Jesus.
    I really enjoy the different content you provide and have read a few of the books you have suggested.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just out of curiosity, what do you think?

      Woody Harrelson's dad?

      Delete
    2. I haven't read any of O'Reilly's books mainly because I find him to be insufferable on television. I've been tempted to read some, though, because I've always been interested in presidential history.

      Delete
  5. Still Life with Crows: Preston and Child, Some Buried Caesar: Rex Stout. Can't help myself, good reading on the airplanes too

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I haven't read any of those. I'll have to look them up. Thanks!

      Delete